Estimating the impact of a denicotinisation policy on smoking behaviours in Australia – an expert knowledge elicitation study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Mandatory reductions in tobacco product nicotine content to non-addictive levels may help achieve a tobacco endgame. Evidence exists for potential positive impacts of ‘very low nicotine content’ (VLNC) cigarettes in promoting smoking cessation in trial settings, but the population-level policy impact is unknown.

Methods

An online expert knowledge elicitation survey was undertaken to generate estimates for the impact of a VLNC mandate in Australia. Global experts in tobacco control were recruited to individually estimate impacts on smoking initiation, cessation, and switching to e-cigarettes or illicit market cigarettes. Linear pooling was used to estimate a combined (non-parametric) distribution per question, incorporating minimum, maximum, and best guess values from each respondent.

Results

The survey was completed by 15 experts. Interquartile ranges from pooled responses indicated that in the first year of a VLNC policy, smoking cessation could increase by 1.2-7.1 times the rate without the policy and switching to vaping by 1.3-8 times. Switching to illicitly supplied ‘normal’ nicotine cigarettes was estimated between 15-50% of those who smoke. Smoking initiation estimates varied greatly. Experts from Australia (n=8) consistently reported lower estimates for positive outcomes, and higher illicit market switching estimates, than experts from other countries.

Conclusions

Given the absence of implementation evidence, this study provides Australia-specific estimates of the potential behavioural effects of a VLNC policy. The findings suggest that denicotinisation would accelerate declines in smoking, but that it may be undermined by illicit cigarette access in Australia. Estimates should be updated with real-world evidence as it becomes available.

Implications

  • This study quantifies a range of behavioural responses to a national-level VLNC mandate in Australia, based on the knowledge of 15 global experts in tobacco control.

  • The pooled responses indicate that a VLNC mandate could increase smoking cessation and switching to e-cigarette use, with variable impacts on youth smoking and vaping uptake.

  • Denicotinisation could accelerate progress towards a tobacco endgame in Australia, but its benefits may be limited if illicit access to nicotine-containing cigarettes continues. Future modelling in Australia based on this analysis must explicitly consider the wide variation in expert responses, and other sources of evidence.

Article activity feed