Social Adversity, Systemic Inflammation, and the Ticking of the Biological Aging Clocks in Men and Women

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: We tested how multi-level socioeconomic disadvantage relates to biological aging and systemic inflammation in women and men from the population-based Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Methods: We examined cross-sectional data from 8,516 CLSA participants with baseline measures on systemic inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumoral necrosis factor-α) and biological aging (metabolomic and six DNA methylation [DNAm] age estimates). Plasma samples underwent metabolomic profiling by Metabolon, Inc. Metabolomic age was estimated separately in males and females using sex-stratified models based on age-correlated metabolite levels. DNAm data generated using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC v1.0 array were used to estimate DNAm age across six established models, including Horvath, Hannum, PhenoAge, GrimAge, GrimAge2, and DunedinPACE. We used log-transformed metabolite levels to calculate metabolomic age by sex. We linked education, income, material and social deprivation to biomarkers of systemic inflammation and biological aging stratified by sex using generalized linear models. Multivariable models were adjusted by age, major behavioral risk factors, and chronic conditions. Results: Participants were aged on average of 62.6 years of age, and approximately 50% were females. In multivariable linear adjusted models, we found that in comparison to those earning ≥$100K a year, women earning less <$20K were on average 1.14 (95%CI: 0.46, 1.82) year older with respect to metabolomic age; those earning ≥$20K & <$50K were on average 0.90 (95%CI: 0.26, 1.53) years older; and those earning ≥$50K & <$100K were on average 0.70 (95%CI: 0.05, 1.34) years older. We did not observe this dose response among men. A similar dose-response association was observed for interleukin-6 in both men and women. Discussion: These findings suggest that socioeconomic adversity influences not only inflammatory pathways but also distinct biological aging processes, including metabolomic aging.

Article activity feed