Intravesical Lacticaseicillus rhamnosus GG reduces symptoms among people with spinal cord injury and disease who use intermittent catheterization: A randomized comparison of two- and four-dose regimens

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common secondary condition among people with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D). Intravesical Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is an antibiotic-sparing approach to managing urinary symptoms.

Objective

Determine the optimal number of doses of intravesical LGG for urinary symptom reduction.

Design

Prospective, randomized, two-arm dosing trial.

Setting

National recruitment with a local subsample providing urine samples in Washington, DC, USA.

Participants

Adults with SCI/D and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) who use intermittent catheterization (IC); 177 enrolled and randomized (intention-to-treat), with 76 compliant instillers (39 low-dose, 37 high-dose) in the per-protocol analytic sample.

Interventions

Two (2 doses/24 hours) or four (4 doses/36 hours) intravesical LGG regimens, self-initiated in response to cloudier or malodorous urine per the Self-Management Protocol using Probiotics (SMP-Pro).

Main Outcome Measures

Primary: proportion achieving ≥20% reduction on the Urinary Symptom Questionnaire for Neurogenic Bladder–Intermittent Catheter version (USQNB-IC). Secondary: urinary biomarkers (leukocyte esterase, nitrite, white blood cells, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [uNGAL]) and standard urine culture (SUC) in a local subsample.

Results

By Day 2, 57.9% (63.8% low-dose; 51.2% high-dose) achieved ≥20% total symptom reduction; high-dose success rose to 70.0% by Day 4. Thirty percent of high-dose participants did not respond at either time point and could not be distinguished from responders by demographics or urine biomarkers. Urinary biomarkers and SUC were unchanged pre- to post-instillation. No serious adverse events were adjudicated as attributable to intravesical LGG by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).

Conclusions

A two-dose course of intravesical LGG yields clinically meaningful symptom improvement in the majority of people with SCI/D and NLUTD who use IC; four doses benefits a meaningful subgroup of two-day non-responders, while a small cohort remains nonresponsive. These results provide preliminary dosing guidance and support progression to a definitive trial.

Article activity feed