Early identification of suboptimal responders to metformin in type 2 diabetes using long-term real-world HbA1c trajectories
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aims
Metformin remains the primary treatment for type 2 diabetes, yet over 40% of patients fail to maintain glycaemic control. We aimed to identify patients unlikely to respond to metformin prior to treatment initiation and to evaluate whether on-treatment management can improve glycaemic outcomes in suboptimal responders, informing early treatment decisions.
Materials and Methods
We analyzed 59,881 longitudinal HbA1c measurements from 7,105 patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin monotherapy using real-world electronic health records from Kaiser Permanente Northern California with up to six years of follow-up. We integrated demographic, clinical, genetic, and pharmacological factors to characterize metformin responder phenotypes and quantify the impact of adherence and weight control on time to glycaemic failure.
Results
Three distinct trajectory-based phenotypes were identified: good (63.6%), poor (8.9%), and non-responders (27.5%). Poor responders initially achieved glycaemic targets but lost control within 2.5 years, while non-responders showed minimal HbA1c reduction and failed within 1 year. Five baseline factors—HbA1c, age at diagnosis, body mass index, sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate—classified phenotypes with good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.84). Incorporating on-treatment HbA1c further enhanced identification of non-responders. Among suboptimal responders, weight control and improved adherence delayed glycaemic failure by approximately 7 months; however, eventual glycaemic failure remained likely.
Conclusions
We characterized three clinically relevant metformin responder phenotypes and showed that suboptimal responders can be identified early using baseline features. Poor and non-responders are unlikely to achieve durable glycaemic control with metformin alone and may require alternative treatment strategies.
