Across-Site MRI Prediction of Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Radiomics versus Deep Learning Features

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the cross-site generalization of radiomic features and deep learning embeddings for MRI prediction of substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective two-center study included 206 women (mean age, 59.8 years) with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative 3-T MRI from March 2016 to March 2023. Hospital A (n = 130) was used for development and Hospital B (n = 76) for strict external testing. T2-weighted, reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted, and apparent diffusion coefficient images were manually segmented. Radiomic features and seed-pooled embeddings from 3D ResNet18, DenseNet121, and U-NEXtractor were modeled with elastic-net logistic regression or XGBoost. Out-of-fold Platt calibration and sensitivity-targeted thresholds were estimated using development data only. AUCs were summarized with 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.

Results

External radiomics with elastic-net achieved an AUC of 0.609 (95% CI: 0.464, 0.740) and sensitivity of 0 of 12 (0%). DenseNet121 with elastic-net had the highest external AUC (0.685; 95% CI: 0.538, 0.822) but sensitivity of 3 of 12 (25%). U-NEXtractor with elastic-net detected 10 of 12 positive cases (83.3%) with specificity of 32 of 64 (50.0%) and balanced accuracy of 0.667. XGBoost showed higher apparent development performance but weaker external operating behavior.

Conclusion

Under real-world cross-site MRI acquisition shift, DenseNet121 and U-NEXtractor embeddings showed better external generalization than handcrafted radiomic features for substantial LVSI prediction.

Article activity feed