Protein tertiary packing is nearly achiral

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The chirality of proteins originates at the Cα stereocentre of each L-amino acid, and is expressed in secondary structure as the consistent twist of α-helices and β-sheets. How far does this handedness propagate as secondary-structure elements pack into a tertiary fold? This question is central to the development of neural networks for the design of heterochiral and mixed-chirality proteins containing mirror-image D-amino acids. Such networks are most effectively trained on the far more abundant structural data available for natural all-L proteins, yet in practice they must generate and evaluate the reflected, D-configured counterparts, which are not explicitly represented in the training set. Here, I develop a spatial tessellation-based parity-odd descriptor, the signed volume of Delaunay tetrahedra ( V D ), to measure how chirality is distributed in protein structure. Reflecting a structure only flips the sign of any parity-odd descriptor, so the asymmetry of the V D distribution quantifies the chirality of a given sequence-local or tertiary structural element. I find that the signed Delaunay volume distribution within individual secondary-structure elements is strongly asymmetric, but this handedness largely cancels once elements pack against one another. The resulting tertiary distribution is nearly symmetric across a broad range of structures, from monomers to protein-protein and protein-ligand complexes. Individual folds can nonetheless be strongly handed at the tertiary scale, solenoid and repeat proteins most of all, yet across a broad sample of the fold universe this handedness cancels, leaving the ensemble near-achiral. Tertiary packing is therefore only weakly chiral, with the small residual handedness greatest at binding interfaces and near-zero in the buried core. How much chirality a model perceives in a D-protein is thus largely a choice of representation, a trade-off between reflection symmetry and the richness of structural information the representation retains. Because V D reduces the parity-odd content of each structural element to a single scalar while capturing tertiary protein packing, it offers a natural representation for the design of heterochiral complexes and mixed-chirality proteins.

Significance Statement

The macromolecules of life are handed, and this mirror-asymmetry is built into every protein at the scale of its amino-acid monomers. Local segments of proteins are also strongly handed. Alpha helices and beta sheets are consistently right-handed. Does this handedness build up through the layers of a protein’s structure, as in some synthetic polymers, or cancel? Using a geometric test across thousands of structures, we find that it largely cancels: the 3D-packing of a folded protein, when described as a tetrahedral tessellation, is almost symmetric under reflection, though its building blocks are not. This means that the design of mirror-image D-protein binders, which are attractive as protease-resistant, low-immunogenicity drug candidates, could rely on AI models trained only on natural L-proteins, using representations developed here.

Article activity feed