Mapping the neural circuitry of cognitive restructuring in depressive and anxiety disorders
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Cognitive restructuring, the process of identifying and challenging negative thoughts, is a key technique for treating depressive and anxiety disorders. Although neuroimaging studies have characterised the brain systems supporting cognitive restructuring in healthy individuals, it remains unclear how these systems are altered in depression and anxiety, or whether each disorder is associated with distinct neural dysfunction.
Methods
Seventy-three clinical participants with depressive or anxiety disorders and 70 healthy controls completed a cognitive restructuring paradigm during 7 Tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The task required participants to either repeat a series of negative statements or challenge them using Socratic questioning. Group-level fMRI analyses examined the effects of depressive and anxiety symptom severity on brain activation, while dynamic causal modelling characterized the directional neural influences between implicated regions.
Results
During challenging compared to repeating statements, greater depressive symptoms were associated with reduced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) activation. Conversely, greater anxiety symptoms were associated with greater dlPFC activation. Effective connectivity results revealed that depressive symptoms were associated with greater inhibition from the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, whereas anxiety symptoms were associated with greater excitation from the dlPFC to amygdala and greater inhibition from the vlPFC to amygdala.
Conclusions
While clinical participants modified negative beliefs as effectively as healthy controls, depressive and anxiety symptoms were associated with dissociable neural signatures during restructuring. This suggests that cognitive behavioral therapy may engage partially distinct mechanisms depending on symptom profile, a possibility that warrants longitudinal investigation of treatment response.