Meta-analysis as a barycenter of study distributions: information-geometric pooling, heterogeneity, and robustness

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Meta-analysis usually reduces each study to an effect estimate with a standard error and pools these by inverse-variance weighting: fixed effect (FE), random effects (RE), or unrestricted weighted least squares (UWLS). We propose information-geometric meta-integration (IGMI), representing each study by its sampling distribution, the Gaussian N ( θ i , Σ i ), and pooling studies as a weighted Fréchet mean (barycenter) under Bures–Wasserstein (BW), Fisher–Rao, or Wasserstein–Fisher–Rao (WFR) geometry. In the scalar fixed-variance case the BW barycenter mean is exactly the FE estimate; the minimized Fréchet functional reproduces Higgins–Thompson I 2 and DerSimonian–Laird and a Fréchet-scatter pivot reproduces the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman interval at m = 1 and yields an exact Hotelling F m,Km region for m outcomes under proportional total covariances. WFR adds a robust outlier-resistant pool: as its length scale δ → ∞ it converges monotonically to BW, whereas finite δ gives a redescending M-estimator with rejection point exactly πδ . Simulations show calibrated multivariate coverage at small K , where Wald intervals undercover, and strong resistance of the equal-weight WFR pool to contamination. In 2,445 Cochrane meta-analyses, WFR most often wins leave-one-out predictive scoring. In 835 bivariate meta-analyses, the closed-form BW barycenter matches REML multivariate meta-analysis predictively and is exactly invariant to the unreported within-study correlation, unlike the likelihood estimate. Methods are implemented in the development R package gtmeta , available as a GitHub source repository.

Article activity feed