Muscle stability deficits are strongly associated with musculoskeletal complaints in football (soccer) players: the AF-Ratio outperforms conventional strength parameters—a cross-sectional study with preliminary follow-up

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective

Given the high injury burden in football and the documented limitations of strength-based screening, novel approaches are warranted. Adaptive Force (AF)—being closer to injury-prone movements than pushing/pulling strength—offers an alternative. This study examined the association between AF-based muscle stability and musculoskeletal complaints in football players and compared AF-derived and conventional strength parameters in their discriminative capacity, complemented by a preliminary prospective follow-up.

Methods

AF and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were measured in 23 male football players across five bilateral muscle groups (knee extensors/flexors; hip flexors/adductors/abductors). AF parameters (maximal isometric AF, maximal AF, AF-Ratio), MVIC and hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio were compared between players with and without complaints assessed via questionnaire at baseline and six-month follow-up (n=13).

Results

Stability deficits were strongly associated with complaints (OR=54.0, 82% side concordance). AF-Ratio discriminated clearly between players with and without complaints ( d =−1.47), with hip abductors showing the strongest effect ( d =−1.64). Players with subsequent complaints showed lower baseline AF-Ratio ( d =−1.45) and more stability deficits ( d =1.67). MVIC and H:Q ratio did not discriminate ( p >0.430).

Conclusion

The findings suggest that muscle stability assessment outperforms conventional strength parameters in discriminating players with and without complaints, with preliminary follow-up data providing tentative support for predictive value. The concept of functional instability syndrome (FIS) provides a mechanistic framework for non-contact injuries and musculoskeletal complaints. AF assessment offers potential for screening, including return-to-sport decisions. Further studies are needed to verify the results, investigate predictive value, and evaluate whether personalised stability-based interventions can reduce injury incidence.

What is already known on this topic

  • Conventional strength-based screening has shown limited predictive value for injuries in football, with no strength parameter reaching significance in meta-analysis.

  • Adaptive Force (AF) assesses adaptive holding capacity (muscle stability)—a neuromuscular function closer to injury-prone movements than conventional strength; its association with musculoskeletal complaints in athletes and specifically in football players was unknown.

  • What this study adds

    • Stability deficits (impaired holding capacity) were strongly associated with musculoskeletal complaints (OR=54.0) with preliminary prospective support, whereas maximal pushing strength and H:Q ratio did not discriminate.

    • Hip abductors showed the strongest association with complaints across all body regions—a muscle group rarely included in conventional screening.

    How this study might affect research, practice or policy

    • AF assessment may complement or refine current screening and prevention strategies by identifying neuromuscular impairments not detected by conventional strength methods, supporting a shift towards stability-based screening, pending prospective validation.

    Article activity feed