Expert perspectives on improving services for patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures: a qualitative study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
The incidence of post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) is increasing. However, specific clinical guidance relating to patient management does not exist, resulting in variations in care and outcomes. This study aimed to elicit and synthesise expert knowledge in POPFF service delivery and explore views on variations in service provision and the factors influencing these.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with healthcare professionals with expertise in POPFF care from England and Wales to explore current practices, challenges, service variations and perceived future opportunities. Participants were identified through specialist research and clinical networks for POPFF and hip fracture care, authors of key publications on the subject, national leads for POPFF/hip fracture networks, and research team contacts. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
Ten interviews were undertaken with experts in POPFF services across a range of professional roles. Four themes were identified: conceptualisation of POPFF (by different professional groups and in different service settings) and understanding of POPFF patient needs; sources of variation in management and care of POPFF patients; service model rationales, advantages and disadvantages; and potential strategies to improve POPFF care.
Conclusion
When designing POPFF services, we suggest that four key areas need consideration: the extent to which POPFF patients are a distinct group with particular care needs; the necessity for and consequences of patient transfer between wards and hospitals; the resourcing of extensive multidisciplinary support for POPFF patients; and the need for national initiatives to encourage service developments.
These findings should form the basis of future clinical guidance. Sensitivity to contextual factors driving variation in services is needed to ultimately improve care for POPFF patients.
