Integrating Causal Inference into Pharmacovigilance: Target Trial Emulations for Proactive Signal Detection of Atorvastatin Initiation in Medicare Beneficiaries

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Importance

Adverse drug events (ADEs) in older adults are a substantial public health burden, yet spontaneous reporting systems detect them poorly owing to underreporting and the lack of a defined population. These limitations are of particular concern for older adults, who are underrepresented in pre-approval trials yet at elevated ADE risk owing to polypharmacy, multimorbidity, and age-related changes in drug metabolism.

Objective

To develop and apply an active, claims-based pharmacovigilance framework using sequential target trial emulation to detect ADE signals in older adults, with atorvastatin as the initial application.

Methods

Using Medicare fee-for-service claims (2017-2019), we studied statin-naïve beneficiaries aged 65 years or older following hospitalization for myocardial or cerebral infarction. We emulated up to 14 daily sequential trials from the discharge date, classifying patients as initiating atorvastatin (A1), initiating a different medication (A2), or no new medication (A0); the primary contrast was A1 versus A2. For each trial, incident outcomes were ascertained and classified into 552 outcomes based on the Clinical Classifications Software Refined categories. Per-protocol effects were estimated over a 6-month follow-up period using Fine-Gray regression weighted by the inverse probability of treatment and censoring, treating death as a competing risk, with the false discovery rate controlled via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. A signal was declared when the q-value was ≤ 0.10 and the subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) was ≥ 1.20 in any prespecified analytic stratum (sensitivity analyses used thresholds of q ≤ 0.20 and sHR ≥ 1.20).

Results

Of 70,130 eligible patients, 39,948 initiated atorvastatin (A1), 19,182 initiated another new medication (A2); after weighting, baseline characteristics were closely balanced. After excluding outcomes with sparse cell counts, 295 outcomes were analyzed; five met the primary signal detection criteria: valve disorders (sHR 1.71, 1.20-2.43); sprains and strains (sHR 1.79, 1.26-2.54); general sensation/perception symptoms (sHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.36); abnormal findings without diagnosis (sHR 1.55, 1.18-2.05); and prediabetes (sHR 1.71, 1.24-2.36). In the sensitivity analysis, we additionally detected: posthemorrhagic anemia, hemorrhagic stroke, varicose veins, other circulatory and skin conditions.

Conclusions

An active, claims-based framework using sequential target trial emulation detected both expected and previously unrecognized ADE signals following atorvastatin initiation in older adults, offering a systematic alternative to passive surveillance that can be extended to other commonly prescribed medications.

KEY POINTS

Question

Can an active, claims-based pharmacovigilance framework using sequential target trial emulation detect adverse drug event signals among older Medicare beneficiaries who initiated atorvastatin?

Findings

In this cohort study of 59,130 Medicare beneficiaries discharged after myocardial or cerebral infarction, a hypothesis-free scan across hundreds of prespecified outcomes detected several signals of potential harm associated with atorvastatin initiation (valve disorders, sprains and strains, sensory symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, prediabetes, and hemorrhagic stroke), each consistent with documented statin adverse drug reactions.

Meaning

This framework offers a systematic, quantitative alternative to spontaneous reporting for detecting medication safety signals in older adults.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Older adults use more prescription drugs than any other age group, yet they are often left out of clinical trials conducted before a drug is approved. As a result, the safety of many medications in older patients is poorly understood until the drugs are already in wide use. The main system for detecting new drug safety problems in the United States, the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, relies on voluntary reports and captures only a small fraction of harms, which limits its usefulness.

Using Medicare records, the researchers developed an active monitoring method and tested it on a commonly used cholesterol-lowering medication (atorvastatin) – that is frequently prescribed after a heart attack or stroke. They followed thousands of patients for six months, statistically balancing those who started atorvastatin with those who started a different new drug, and screened for hundreds of possible side effects. Evidence of potential medication harm emerged along a clear range of how likely the drug caused each problem. This ranged from well-known side effects (such as diabetes and sprains and strains) and outcomes already noted in the product labeling or prior research (such as hemorrhagic stroke and dizziness) to more uncertain associations (such as cardiac valve disorders) that are difficult to interpret. Overall, atorvastatin appeared largely safe in this older population, and the same method can now be used to study other widely used drugs.

Article activity feed