In vivo gene disruption and homology-directed repair in muscles and muscle stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Programmable endonucleases such as CRISPR/Cas9 provide powerful tools to edit mammalian genomes by engaging cellular mechanisms of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. CRISPR-catalysed homology-directed repair (CRISPR-HDR), though generally less efficient than other modes of DNA repair, holds particular promise to enable precise sequence replacement by targeted insertion of a homologous DNA template 1,2 . While recent studies have reported appreciable levels of HDR in cardiomyocytes in vivo 3 , skeletal muscle myofibres have historically been considered refractory to HDR-mediated genome editing 4 . Furthermore, how repair outcomes differ across tissues after systemic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 editors, whether precise HDR editing can be achieved in regenerative tissue stem cells, and how developmental timing influences accessibility to CRISPR-induced repair remain unclear. Here, we use an adeno-associated virus (AAV)-delivered in vivo GFP-to-BFP colour-switching reporter system (AAV-GFP-to-BFP) to examine in vivo CRISPR-HDR with cellular- and tissue-level resolution. We find that postnatal cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, and muscle stem cells undergo templated HDR at different rates across discrete developmental stages in mice. While HDR-edited muscle stem cells and myofibres were readily detectable after in vivo editing in juvenile mice, editing in neonatal mice yielded more efficient HDR in cardiac tissue. Based on these results, we adapted the CRISPR-HDR approach to rescue the therapeutically relevant Dmd mutation in mdx mice, demonstrating recoding to the wild-type protein sequence in both skeletal and cardiac muscles. These results provide a framework for advancing donor-templated DNA repair in living postnatal animals, and reveal unexpected cellular, developmental, and disease-related constraints on precise, therapeutic in vivo gene correction.