Sublethal immune resistance to parasites generates reaction-norm patterns indistinguishable from tolerance

Hosts defend themselves against parasites through resistance (reducing parasite burden) and tolerance (reducing the fitness cost of infection without affecting parasites). This distinction has important evolutionary implications: resistance is predicted to maintain polymorphism while tolerance tends to fix, and only resistance is expected to provoke parasite counter-adaptation. The reaction-norm framework, which infers tolerance from the slope of host fitness regressed on parasite burden, assumes that a shallow slope reflects parasite-independent host protection. We test this assumption using a within-host model in two variants: microparasites (Model 1, with within-host replication) and macroparasites (Model 2, without). Sublethal immunity impairs the parasite’s host-exploitation rate, reducing both growth and per-parasite virulence without killing them. We show that this generates systematic slope differences among host genotypes that the framework interprets as variation in tolerance. Furthermore, the ranking of genotypes’ slopes reverses between linear and sigmoidal damage functions: under linear damage, the strongest immune responder appears most tolerant; under sigmoidal damage, the weakest responder does. Decomposition of the damage reduction shows that virulence reduction accounts for the majority of the effect across both model variants. Thus, the reaction-norm slope cannot determine whether host fitness is maintained by parasite-independent tissue protection or by sublethal impairment of parasites.