Multi-modal sleep staging in the clinic for REM sleep behaviour disorder

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Accurate REM identification is critical for diagnosing REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD), yet many automated sleep-staging systems, especially single-channel EEG models trained on healthy cohorts, do not generalise well to real-life polysomnography (PSG) performed in patients. We compared a feature-based Random Forest (RF) model tuned for RBD with a state-of-the-art single-EEG deep architecture (AttnSleep), and assessed the impact of cohort adaptation and multimodal inputs (EEG, EOG, EMG, ECG). Experiments used 89 multi-site in-clinic PSGs (SleepWearables Phase-1) plus 53 MASS healthy controls ((mean age 63 ± 5 years), with 10-fold cross-validation and out-of-fold evaluation. When applied out-of-the-box after training on open-source healthy datasets, both models achieved moderate agreement overall (Cohen’s κ = 0.46), but performance declined in RBD, particularly for REM sleep (AttnSleep Cohen’s κ = 0.19 vs RF Cohen’s κ = 0.44), highlighting limited cross-cohort generalisation. The multi-modal model improved overall agreement (Cohen’s κ 0.59 versus 0.60) and performance in RBD (Cohen’s κ 0.45 versus 0.46), with gains most pronounced in REM (Cohen’s κ 0.45 versus 0.49). Attention-based modality analysis identified EEG as the dominant signal, increased EOG contribution during REM, and elevated ECG importance during N3. In RBD subjects, EOG weighting increased relative to non-RBD controls (Δ = +0.081), suggesting physiological relevance. Guided by these weights, a reduced four-channel EEG model matched full multimodal performance in non-RBD subjects, and adding EOG achieved the best overall configuration (Cohen’s κ = 0.61 overall; Cohen’s κ = 0.48 in RBD) with improved REM classification (53% compared to 45% recall). Inclusion of EOG also reduced inter-dataset variability in REM staging. Nonetheless, staging performance in RBD remained lower than in controls, particularly for REM. These results highlight (1) the limited generalisability of minimal-sensor models trained on healthy cohorts, (2) the value of mixed cohort-specific training, and (3) the benefit of multimodal integration and attention-guided channel selection, rather than minimal-sensor approaches alone for robust clinical sleep staging in pathological populations such as RBD.

Article activity feed