A Systematic Review of Sex Differences in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common consequence of anaesthesia, affecting up to 30% of postoperative patients. Female sex is one of the strongest risk factors for PONV, yet no dedicated analysis has examined how this association varies across surgical settings and timepoints. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify sex differences in PONV incidence across different surgical contexts.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted using PRISMA guidelines across Medline and Embase from inception to September 1, 2025. Eligible studies were observational cohort studies (n≥500) of adult patients that conducted multivariate regression analyses including sex as a variable. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using ROBINS-E. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Subgroup analyses and multiple sensitivity analyses were completed.
Results
From 4620 identified studies, 23 met the inclusion criteria, including 462,828 patients across various surgical settings and specialties (52% female). The pooled incidence of PONV was 21% (95% CI[16-27%]), with high heterogeneity (I 2 =99.9%). Meta-analysis confirmed females had a higher risk of developing PONV compared to males (pooled OR=2.40, 95% CI[2.06-2.79], I 2 =93.1%, p<0.0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of pooled estimates. Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistently elevated risk of PONV for females at all three timepoints (PACU, 24-hour, 48-hour post-operative) and across studies including and excluding female-only surgeries. Studies were generally at high risk of bias.
Discussion
Female sex is a strong risk factor for PONV across surgical settings. Further research into precise subgroups, underlying mechanisms of sex-differences, and the use of prophylaxis may help improve this inequity.
