Screening for Probable Undiagnosed Hypertension in US Adults Using Interpretable Machine Learning: An NHANES 2017-2018 Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Hypertension remains one of the most challenging healthcare problems in the community. It is a common, measurable, and treatable condition that is nonetheless responsible for millions of preventable deaths each year. Hypertension affects approximately 1.28 billion adults worldwide, yet fewer than half (46%) are aware of their condition. Undiagnosed hypertension is a critical public health gap, contributing to preventable cardiovascular morbidity through silent end-organ damage. Machine learning can enable community-level screening using routinely available, non-invasive data, without the requirement of laboratory investigations. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional ML study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 cycle. Adults aged ≥18 years were included; those with a self-reported prior hypertension diagnosis (n=1,930) were retained as negative controls. Probable undiagnosed hypertension was defined as mean blood pressure ≥130/80 mmHg among participants reporting no prior hypertension diagnosis, consistent with the ACC/AHA 2017 threshold. Three classifiers: Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were trained on eight non-invasive predictor variables. Performance was assessed using AUC-ROC, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Stratified 5-fold cross-validation was applied. Results Of 9,254 NHANES 2017-2018 participants, 5,237 adults were included after exclusion criteria were applied; 1,072 (20.5%) had probable undiagnosed hypertension. LR achieved the highest test AUC of 0.611 (95% CI: 0.571-0.652), with sensitivity 0.535 (95% CI: 0.473-0.600) and specificity 0.594 (95% CI: 0.560-0.626). RF demonstrated near-absent sensitivity (0.047) despite adequate AUC (0.607), while XGBoost performed intermediately (AUC: 0.599; sensitivity: 0.279). Diabetes status, sex, and age were the most influential predictors by permutation feature importance. Conclusion ML classifiers trained on eight non-invasive variables demonstrated modest but consistent discrimination for identifying probable undiagnosed hypertension, supporting the feasibility of laboratory-free community screening. External validation in diverse populations is warranted before clinical implementation.

Article activity feed