Factors associated with the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine: The experiences of postpartum women attending child welfare clinics in three rural districts in the Western Region of Ghana
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) is a key preventive strategy. However, optimal uptake remains inconsistent despite high antenatal care (ANC) attendance. This study assessed factors associated with IPTp-SP uptake and explored the experiences of postpartum women in rural Ghana.
Methods
A mixed-method study was conducted among 1,155 postpartum women attending child welfare clinics in Jomoro, Prestea-Huni Valley and Ellembelle districts of the Western Region of Ghana. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires and analysed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Qualitative data from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were analysed thematically to explore women’s experiences and perceptions.
Results
Overall, 73.5% (812/1105) of respondents received at least three doses of SP during pregnancy, in line with WHO recommendations. The most common number of doses received was three doses (31.5%, 348/1105), followed by four doses (26.4%, 292/1105), while a smaller proportion (8.1%, 90/1105) received only one dose. Knowledge of malaria in pregnancy was generally high: 92.7% (1027/1155) of respondents correctly identified its mode of transmission, while 75.1% (830/1155) and 83.5% (923/1155) were aware of the effects of malaria on pregnancy and the foetus, respectively. Uptake was not significantly associated with socio-demographic characteristics, including age, education, occupation, marital status, gravidity, and parity (p > 0.05). However, number of ANC visits was significantly associated with uptake (p = 0.006). Although not statistically significant, lower uptake was observed among peri-urban residents and uninsured women. Qualitative findings indicated that while women recognized the benefits of IPTp-SP, side effects such as nausea, dizziness, and discomfort, as well as challenges with tablet formulation and dosing negatively influenced adherence.
Conclusions
IPTp-SP uptake was high and largely independent of socio-demographic factors but strongly influenced by ANC attendance. Addressing experiential barriers and strengthening patient-centered counselling during ANC may further improve uptake and adherence.
