Timing of S. aureus -related mortality in a large randomized clinical trial: Implications for future study design

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Longer follow-up periods in clinical trials for S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) may capture unrelated deaths, adding random noise that risks biasing trial results towards the null.

Objective

To evaluate the timing and infection-relatedness of deaths within a large SAB clinical trial platform.

Design

Blinded duplicate adjudication of trial deaths using a modified 7-point Likert-Scale. A third reviewer settled disagreements.

Setting

37 Canadian hospitals participating in the S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) Trial.

Participants

1515 adult patients recruited to SNAP between February 2022 and May 2026.

Measurements

Timing and relatedness of 90-day deaths categorized as at least possibly SAB-related not likely to be SAB-related. Optimal follow-up cut-off was determined using Youden’s index and graphically.

Results

247 deaths occurred; 97 (39.3%) were adjudicated as at least possibly SAB-related and 150 (60.7%) as not likely related. For probably/definitely related deaths, interrater agreement was 85.0% (Gwet’s AC=0.73, substantial); for at least possibly related, it was 77.3% (Gwet’s AC=0.55, moderate). Median survival was significantly shorter for SAB-related deaths (12 vs. 30.5 days; difference: 19 days earlier, 95% CI: 12-26, p<0.0001). Nearly 80% of SAB-related deaths occurred by day 30, whereas 50% of unrelated deaths occurred between days 30 and 90. Youden’s index optimized follow-up at 20.5 days.

Limitations

Potential for cause-of-death misclassification and data limited to Canadian sites.

Conclusion

Deaths considered attributable to SAB cluster rapidly within the first month, while later deaths are predominantly unrelated. A 30-day all-cause mortality window may be more appropriate than 90 days for primary mortality outcomes in trials evaluating acute SAB therapies with longer follow up reserved for metastatic infection and recurrence.

Article activity feed