Biomedical knowledge gaps, supernatural causal beliefs and the traditional-first treatment pathway sustaining onchocerciasis transmission despite mass drug administration in Bo District, Sierra Leone: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Onchocerciasis (river blindness) persists in Bo District, Sierra Leone, despite two decades of ivermectin-based mass drug administration (MDA). Whether community knowledge, causal beliefs and treatment-seeking continue to favour transmission has not been quantified at scale. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, we surveyed 1,500 adults across five endemic chiefdoms (Bagbwe, Baoma, Gbo, Selenga, Tikonko) using multistage cluster sampling, and conducted 11 key informant interviews and 8 focus group discussions analysed thematically. Biomedical perception was measured with closed items summed into a composite score (range 0–3); the principal behavioural outcome was traditional-first treatment (use of traditional remedies before modern care). Quantitative data were analysed with chi-square tests, logistic regression, and ROC analysis. Biomedical understanding was moderate and incomplete: only 46.5% correctly identified the blackfly vector and 38.1% judged community awareness sufficient, while supernatural or moral attributions accounted for 68.1% of social explanations and half the sample (50.3%) endorsed a traditional or spiritual origin (mean composite perception 1.77/3). Perception did not vary across chiefdoms (all Cramér’s V < .06); the only consistent correlate was prior experience of the disease, which raised the odds of adequate perception (OR = 0.77 for inadequate perception, p = .016). Traditional-first treatment was the modal pathway (55.3%), care-seeking was reactive (70.1% acted only on symptom onset) and socially governed (71.3% consulted family or peers), and traditional healers were present in most communities (56.9%). A flagship logistic model predicting traditional-first treatment had negligible explanatory power (McFadden R² = .005; likelihood-ratio p = .737; AUC = 0.544), with only distrust of modern medicine showing a directional effect (OR = 1.33, p = .065). Qualitative accounts explained these patterns as a coherent cultural logic rather than ignorance, rooted in naming the disease for water, spiritual aetiologies, the invisibility of the parasite, and the complementary role of healers. Aetiology-aligned health communication, engagement of traditional healers and gender-sensitive MDA delivery are needed to close the residual transmission gap.

Article activity feed