Frequency-dependent cognitive effects of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  1. Bruna Meira
  2. Paulo Bastos
  3. Vítor Mendes Ferreira
  4. João Albuquerque
  5. Marta Magriço
  6. Raquel Lemos
  7. Raquel Barbosa
  8. Miguel Coelho
  9. Marcelo Mendonça
Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) improves levodopa-induced motor complications and cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but stimulation frequency may differentially shape outcomes. This is evident for axial and gait symptoms, which may respond differently to lower-frequency stimulation. Whether frequency-dependent effects extend to cognition remains unclear.

Objective

To investigate the cognitive effects of DBS at distinct frequencies in PD.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO - CRD42024618253). PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing cognitive outcomes under different stimulation frequencies. Eight cognitive domains were defined: verbal fluency, cognitive flexibility, executive control, working memory, attention, processing speed, episodic memory, and time processing. Multilevel random-effects meta-analyses were performed, with effect sizes expressed as Hedges’ g.

Results

Forty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, the majority (n = 31) involving STN-DBS. Twenty-one STN-DBS studies, including 355 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with HFS (≥ 130 Hz), lower frequencies (4-80 Hz) were associated with better verbal fluency (g = 0.27) and cognitive flexibility (g = 0.38), with consistent effects across sensitivity and leave-one-out analyses. Accuracy-based executive control measures also favored lower-frequency stimulation. OFF-stimulation comparisons showed a concordant pattern. Evidence for other targets (PPN and NBM) was limited.

Conclusions

Lower-frequency STN-DBS was associated with modest benefits in specific cognitive domains compared with HFS. These findings highlight the need for future research to determine how frequency interacts with stimulation location and symptom-specific networks to shape cognitive and cognitive-motor outcomes in PD.

Highlights

  • Systematic Review of 43 studies addressing he cognitive effects of DBS at distinct frequencies.

  • Low frequency STN-DBS improves verbal fluency and cognitive flexibility vs high-frequency stimulation.

  • Low frequency STN-DBS appears to benefit verbal fluency and executive control in comparison to OFF stimulation.

  • Effects are robust across multiple sensitivity analyses and are independent from medication state.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.64898/2026.06.17.26355717 on medRxiv