CellTosg2Sequence: A Unified Text-Omics-Signaling-Graph Large Language Model for Single-Cell Analysis
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
In single-cell (sc)-based scientific discovery, text-formatted biomedical prior knowledge and signaling graphs are essential for annotating and interpreting numeric sc-omics data and for generating novel testable hypotheses. A major limitation of existing single-cell large language models (scLLMs) is that they rely on numeric expression data with gene names as the only textual signal, while comprehensive biomedical priors — cellular localization, gene function, disease associations, and signaling interaction patterns — remain absent from the model input. We introduce CellTosg2Sequence , a textual-prior- and signaling-graph-augmented cell-omics-sentence language model.
A lightweight heterogeneous graph encoder maps a curated 62,507-node biomedical knowledge graph (KG) into compact virtual tokens that are prepended to each cell sentence, allowing the language model to condition on biological structure with minimal sequence-length overhead. We train CellTosg2Sequence with a three-stage objective: Stage I anchors the KG channel under autoregressive language-model pretraining, leveraging Qwen2.5-32B’s own language reasoning for rapid KG alignment; Stage II aligns labels via supervised fine-tuning with KG-anchored InfoNCE; Stage III applies Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) with an ontology-hierarchy reward, enabling free-generation cell-type prediction that generalizes beyond the closed training vocabulary.
Across multiple benchmarks and ablation experiments, CellTosg2Sequence outperforms strong baselines. All results are achieved with lightweight LoRA training and a single unified checkpoint.
Data ethics
This work uses publicly available single-cell datasets from the Human Cell Atlas ( https://www.humancellatlas.org ) and the Tahoe-100M consortium. All HCA constituent studies were collected under appropriate donor consent and institutional oversight as described in their original publications; we perform computational re-analysis only and introduce no new human subjects data. HCA data access follows the HCA Data Portal terms of use. No new patient data are collected in this study; no additional IRB approval is required for this secondary computational analysis.