Multi-stage physics-informed neural networks for JAK–STAT5 signaling and ultradian insulin–glucose dynamics: latent-species identifiability and suppression of parameter-induced divergence
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Coupled diffusion–reaction partial differential equations (PDEs) describe biochemical network dynamics but are difficult to solve for realistic multi-species systems without combining mechanism and data. We present a multi-stage physics-informed neural network (PINN) for multi-species diffusion–reaction PDEs and apply it to two ordinary-differential-equation (ODE) reference systems: the Boehm et al. JAK–STAT5 signaling pathway and the Sturis ultradian insulin–glucose model. For STAT5 we pose a latent-species identifiability test: given sparse observations of eight species, a ten-species model that retains two deliberately withheld but mechanistically standard components—an active receptor–JAK complex and the SOCS negative-feedback inhibitor—recovers the reference trajectory and reduces mean root-mean-square error 3.1-fold relative to an eight-species model that omits them, whereas a PDE-only solution without data anchoring diverges. Because the reference is itself ODE-generated, this demonstrates identifiability against synthetic data, not the discovery of new biology. For the insulin–glucose model the same framework reproduces the ∼120-minute oscillation to 1.0% mean relative error as a benchmark on a stiff, multi-timescale oscillator; its spatial dimension is treated as a numerical construct, not a physical transport setting. A Lyapunov analysis of the STAT5 ODE returns a maximal exponent statistically indistinguishable from zero ( λ max ≈ 3.61 × 10 −5 min −1 , 5/8 trials positive; Lyapunov time ∼1.9 × 10 4 min, far exceeding the 240–720 min horizon), so the system is effectively non-chaotic and the relevant instability is a bounded, parameter-induced trajectory divergence. Anchoring the solution to baseline data suppresses this divergence, with the reduction growing monotonically with sampling density—from ∼15–19% at eight time points to ∼88–97% at sixty-four, depending on perturbation magnitude. The framework thus offers a data-anchored route to latent-species identifiability and divergence suppression in biochemical ODE/PDE systems, demonstrated here against synthetic reference data.
Inside cells, a three-dimensional chemistry of diffusing, reacting molecules drives signaling and rhythm—dynamics that, for realistic networks, strain conventional solvers. Here a multi-stage physics-informed neural network—machine learning constrained by the governing equations—solves stiff, multi-species reaction systems from sparse data. In the JAK–STAT5 signaling pathway, a model that retains two standard but unobserved components (an active receptor complex and a negative-feedback brake) recovers a reference trajectory that a reduced model cannot—a controlled test of whether sparse data can pin down withheld pecies, not a claim of new biology. The same framework reproduces the roughly two-hour insulin–glucose rhythm to within 1% as a benchmark on a stiff oscillator. And anchoring the solution to a few dozen baseline measurements collapses parameter-induced trajectory divergence, turning a parametrically sensitive simulation into a stable one. Where mechanism and data meet, sparse measurements can constrain the structure a model would otherwise leave undetermined.