Intra-Complex Differential Transcription Strategies for Scaffold versus Effector Proteins

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Scaffold-organized multi-protein complexes are major drivers of cellular regulatory pathways, but how the expression of their constituent genes is coordinated to support efficient assembly and cell-to-cell homeostasis remains poorly understood. Using snapTotal-seq data, this study addresses this issue at the transcription level through comparative analyses of stochastic transcription bursting – a major driver of expression level and primary source of its intrinsic cell-to-cell noise. We compared scaffold proteins and their effector partners in major regulatory multi-protein complexes: TNRC6A/B/C (in the miRISC complex) and CNOT1/2 (in the CCR4-NOT complex) in mRNA regulation; and AXIN1, APC, KSR2, AKAPs, DLG1, PATJ, HOMER1/2, and SQSTM1 in signal transduction. Our analyses reveal a shared strategy: compared to genes for active effector partner proteins and the general transcriptome, genes for structural scaffold proteins consistently utilize more frequent and smaller-sized bursting to achieve the fine tuning of a homeostatic expression level. This finding establishes a fundamental link between a protein’s physical role within a regulatory complex and the transcriptional bursting kinetics of its gene.

Article activity feed