Social or non-social? An exploratory approach to study inequity aversion in primates

Inequity aversion, the sensitivity to inequitable outcomes or processes, has been widely studied in nonhuman primates since 2003. Yet, findings remain debated as some could be explained by alternative mechanisms such as frustration or loss aversion, so-called ‘individual contrasts’. Previous work on nonhuman animals has restricted the definition of inequity aversion to the social domain. Here, we propose distinguishing between two different forms: a socially driven form, which depends on comparison with another individual, and an individually based form, caused by a discrepancy between one’s own effort and the expected outcome. Using a task-based methodology, we manipulated both effort and the amount of reward to test for the existence of those different forms and distinguish them from individual contrasts. We presented seven Tonkean macaques ( Macaca tonkeana ) and three brown capuchins ( Sapajus apella ) with low and high effort tasks associated with low and high reward quantities. To test for the presence of individually based inequity aversion, subjects were tested alone in an individual phase. In some of the trials, they were rewarded less than they deserved for the task. To test for socially based inequity aversion, two individuals performed the same task in a social phase but, in some trials, one received a higher-value reward than the other. We recorded the latency to engage in the task as an indicator of reluctance. In the individual phase, macaques were slower to engage with inequitably rewarded tasks, a pattern consistent with an individually based expectation of equity. By contrast, capuchins were faster in this context, suggesting that their responses were more likely driven by individual contrast effects. In a context of social inequity, both species slowed engagement in tasks with inequitable rewards, suggesting an aversion to socially based inequity. These results demonstrate that such a methodology provides a means to study non-social components of inequity aversion. Future studies, conducted on larger and more diverse samples, with rigorous motivational controls and explicit tests looking at the understanding of the link between task and reward, are needed to confirm whether nonhuman primates can display inequity aversion independently of social comparison.