Minimally Invasive Aortic Root Surgery Without Sternotomy: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Benefits of a Totally Endoscopic Approach
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Totally endoscopic aortic root (AR) surgery via right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT) may reduce surgical trauma and accelerate recovery compared with full sternotomy (FS). However, the approach is technically demanding due to limited access and anatomical complexity. This study compares early clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after RAMT versus FS to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the totally endoscopic approach.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study included 149 patients underwent AR surgery via RAMT (n=74) or FS (n=75) between January 2021 and March 2026. Patients with aortic dissection, infective endocarditis, redo surgery, concomitant procedures, or arch replacement were excluded. Operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, 30-day and 1-year mortality were analyzed. QoL was assessed using the Short Form-8 (SF-8) questionnaire.
Results
The median age was 60.0 years, and 79.9% of patients were male. Bentall procedure was performed in 84.6% of patients, 15.4% underwent a David procedure. Compared with FS-AR, RAMT-AR was associated with shorter median operative time (147.0 vs. 178.0 min; p<0.001), lower median chest drainage volume (650.0 vs. 850.0 mL; p<0.001), and shorter median ICU stay (24.0 vs. 25.0 h; p=0.008) and hospital stay (6.0 vs. 8.0 days; p=0.028). Overall, 30-day and 1-year mortality was 0.7%. SF-8 analysis demonstrated significantly higher physical and mental component scores in RAMT-AR patients.
Conclusion
In specialized centers, totally endoscopic AR surgery via RAMT is a safe and feasible minimally invasive approach associated with favorable early outcomes and a potential benefit in postoperative physical and mental QoL by reducing surgical trauma.
