Individual and system causes of moral distress experienced by public health practitioners in Canada
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aims
Moral distress has been studied across many health arenas; however, public health has often been overlooked. Canada is facing a healthcare crisis with a significant number of staff leaving the healthcare field. This study explores the experiences of moral distress in public healthcare practitioners across Canada. Better understanding these experiences can provide insights into how to support staff and prevent attrition in public health.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional qualitative study. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted between May and July 2023, through remote and in person methods. Participants were from nursing, social work, medicine, and dietetics, all working in public health across Canada. Iterative thematic analysis was used. Emergent themes were compared within and across data sets and by participant age and years of experience.
Results/Findings
Experiences that contributed to moral distress included systemic powerlessness, political and ideological overreach, unethical work environments and undervalued expertise. Years of experience and diversity in gender and ethnicity impacted how practitioners navigated moral distress. Experiences where practitioners felt actions went against their values increased during the pandemic, contributing to moral injury.
Conclusions
This study situates the unique position of public health within the health system and explores experiences of moral distress both during and outside the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pandemic brought the concept of moral distress to the forefront of many people’s minds, these experiences existed prior. Addressing the underlying causes will contribute to establishing approaches to support public health practitioners suffering from moral distress and injury.
