Aquifer microbial communities differentially display metabolisms capable of secondary effects on uranium speciation across a former metal processing site
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Groundwater contamination presents challenges across world, yet remediation solutions in variably oxidized regions are limited and many co-interactions between contaminant metals and microbial reactions occur. Here we present a genomic and metabolic study into the biogeochemistry of a uranium-contaminated surficial aquifer site in Riverton, WY. We identified unique communities that varied based on geochemistry, geography, and compartment, matching microbial subsurface studies. Cross-site metabolism tests showed communities had functional capabilities of nitrogen respiration, manganese reduction, iron reduction, and sulfide oxidization. No sites showed evidence of microbial U-bioreduction nor ammonium oxidation. Only former tailings area groundwater and ditch surface water sites nearest a retention pond, and a downgradient oxbow lake exhibited sulfate reduction metabolisms. This was contrary to our hypothesis of near-river downgradient groundwater sites having U and S reduction capability. Most communities which showed S reduction capacity exhibited Fe oxidation capacity. Modeling demonstrated U as calcium uranyl carbonates. Based on our metabolism tests and known mineral and microbial metabolism reduction potentials, this suggests U reduction could only be achieved via abiotic reaction with biogenic sulfide. Of eleven sites tested, it is possible in four. This has impact on future site-specific remediation plans and understanding of microbial reactions in variably reduced zones.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract Text
We performed microbial membership and metabolism measurements across a uranium-contaminated site’s surface and ground waters, then performed analyses relating these metrics to geochemistry at the site. Findings showed variations in the membership, yet mainly similar functional capabilities. Metabolic differences were explained in relationship to uranium cycling and remediation implications.