Spectral Validity and Spindle Detection of Wearable Frontal EEG: A Per-Subject Calibration Framework and Systematic Validation Against Polysomnography Using the Wearanize+ Dataset

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Wearable EEG devices enable home sleep monitoring but require systematic spectral validation before their physiological outputs can serve as proxies for polysomnographic features. This study provides comprehensive spectral validation of the Zmax EEG headband against concurrent PSG using the Wearanize+ dataset. Seventy-one participants with adequate signal quality underwent simultaneous home PSG and Zmax recording. Bandpower correspondence, calibration robustness, within-subject reliability, lateralisation, and spindle detection were evaluated across all sleep stages. Zmax systematically underestimates bandpower across all frequency bands (bias -0.41 to -0.74 log units), attributable to the active Fpz reference electrode. A per-subject N2-referenced calibration eliminates this bias; N2 calibration outperformed N3 and REM alternatives (mean post-calibration r=0.601 vs 0.479 and 0.489). Post-calibration spectral correspondence was strong for alpha (N3: r=0.806) and sigma (N3: r=0.752). Within-subject reliability was excellent (split-half r>0.99). Demographic factors explained less than 4% of offset variance. Lateralisation analysis was underpowered (36–39% power; N=194 required for 80% power). Spindle under-detection was traced to YASA’s relative sigma power pre-filter; lowering this threshold recovered PSG-equivalent counts with near-zero bias. These findings establish a validated calibration framework and evidence-based feature selection recommendations for Zmax-based sleep biomarker research.

Article activity feed