Functionally informed annotation influences pathway-specific polygenic risk and disease inference in Alzheimer’s disease

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Pathway-specific polygenic risk scores (pathway-PRS) measure aggregate risk across single nucleotide variants (SNPs) annotated to pathway genes. In most applications, SNP-to-gene annotation is based on SNP proximity to gene boundaries. This approach is ill-suited for incorporating non-coding SNPs, which can regulate gene expression over long distances and represent a large proportion of risk variants in complex diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). AD therefore provides a useful setting for evaluating whether functionally informed SNP-to-gene annotation improves pathway-PRS construction. Here, we compare AD pathway-PRS performance across annotation strategies that integrate varying levels of functional genomic data, including adult brain chromatin interaction and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data. In the UK Biobank (n=328,526), including AD cases defined by ICD-9/10 codes (n=3,043) and family history of AD/dementia (n=38,589), the strategy integrating chromatin interaction and eQTL data consistently improves pathway-PRS performance. We replicate this finding in independent Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics Consortium data (n=3,370). We further observe that pathway-PRS associations with AD vary by annotation strategy and that integrative annotation increases power to detect sex-dependent and age-at-onset associations. Together, these findings support the use of functionally informed SNP-to-gene annotation for pathway-PRS construction and highlight the importance of applying multiple annotation strategies for robust inference.

Article activity feed