Reliability of Spatiotemporal Neuromuscular Activity Patterns in Magnetomyography Across Force Levels
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background
Magnetomyography (MMG) using an optically pumped magnetometer (OPM) provides a contactless and non-invasive approach to assess neuromuscular activity. However, given the limited studies using optically pumped magnetometer magnetomyography (OPM-MMG) and that those primarily used a single OPM, it remains to be characterized how stable individual neuromuscular activity patterns are over time and across different force levels when using multiple OPMs, specifically an array-based MMG.
Methods
12 healthy subjects performed ramped isometric contractions at 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), while a 2×3 OPM array recorded MMG signals from the tibialis anterior (TA). For the test-retest reliability, ramps at 20% and 60% MVC were each repeated once. For each subject, Spearman’s rank correlation was computed across all OPM sensors between force conditions to assess consistency of feature rankings, and within-subject spatial repeatability between repeated 20% and 60% MVC ramps was quantified using ICC (3,1) (two-way mixed-effects, single-measure, absolute agreement).
Results
In 9 of 12 subjects, Spearman’s rank analyses showed generally high correlations across force levels (ρ = 0.37 to 0.91, p<0.05), whereas in the remaining 3 subjects, spatial patterns were less stable (ρ = −0.73 to 0.58, p<0.05). ICC (3,1) between repeated ramps indicated high within-subject spatial repeatability of the array pattern in 9 out of 12 subjects, with ICC > 0.75 at 20% MVC (5 out of 9 subjects) and 60% MVC (6 out of 9 subjects), respectively. In contrast, the remaining 3 subjects showed lower ICCs (20% MVC: −0.28 to 0.51; 60% MVC: 0.22 to 0.80).
Conclusion
Array-based OPM-MMG shows high within-subject stability of spatial patterns across force levels and strong test–retest repeatability in the majority of subjects (9 out of 12), supporting its use for characterizing force-dependent neuromuscular activity while acknowledging inter-subject variability.
