Normative modeling for quantitative brain MRI phenotyping and biomarker discovery for pediatric leukodystrophies
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Importance
Leukodystrophies are a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders affecting the white matter of the brain, often presenting with overlapping clinical features but differing in neuroanatomical involvement. There is a critical need for quantitative tools to characterize disease burden and support diagnosis, severity stratification, and clinical trial readiness.
Objective
To characterize shared and distinct neuroanatomical patterns across six genetically confirmed leukodystrophies using anatomical MRI-derived phenotypes benchmarked against brain growth charts, and to assess the utility of this methodological approach for identifying imaging biomarkers of disease severity.
Design
Cross-sectional neuroimaging study using retrospective clinical MRI data.
Setting
Multicenter study incorporating data from the Global Leukodystrophy Initiative Clinical Trials Network (GLIA-CTN) and control data from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Participants
The study included 434 MRI scan sessions from 274 patients with genetically confirmed leukodystrophies (Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, Metachromatic leukodystrophy, Alexander disease, Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, TUBB4A-related leukodystrophies, and POLR3-related leukodystrophy). Control MRI data (7628 scans from 7205 subjects) were drawn from the Scans with Limited Imaging Pathology cohort at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Exposures
All MRI scans underwent automated segmentation using deep learning segmentation tools to derive global and regional brain volumes. Normative models of brain development (“brain growth charts”) were generated for the control cohort using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. Centile scores were then calculated for leukodystrophy subjects to quantify deviations from typical development.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Centile scores for global and regional brain volumes were compared across leukodystrophy subtypes to identify disease-specific neuroanatomical patterns and to evaluate their potential utility for severity stratification.
Results
Distinct patterns of neuroanatomical deviation were observed across leukodystrophy subtypes. Certain leukodystrophies showed preferential involvement of specific cortical or subcortical regions, while others displayed more diffuse volume loss. Centile scores demonstrated potential for differentiating disease subtypes and stratifying individuals by severity. Preliminary longitudinal data suggest centile scores may also track progression over time.
Conclusions and Relevance
This study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of MRI profiling of individuals with leukodystrophy using anatomical MRI-derived phenotypes benchmarked against brain growth charts. The approach enables data-driven, quantitative characterization of structural brain abnormalities, offering a scalable method for phenotyping, diagnosis, and future use in clinical trials.
Key Points
Question
In genetically confirmed leukodystrophies, can anatomical MRI measurements benchmarked against brain growth charts identify neuroanatomical patterns that correlate with clinical function and disease severity?
Findings
In this cross-sectional neuroimaging study of six leukodystrophies, imaging-derived quantitative phenotypes benchmarked against brain growth charts revealed neuroanatomical patterns of volume loss consistent with previously-reported qualitative changes for each disorder. These patterns of regional volume loss correlated with measures of clinical function, particularly in POLR3-related leukodystrophy, TUBB4A-related leukodystrophy, and Aicardi-Goutières Syndrome.
Meaning
Brain growth charts may be a valuable tool for characterizing the patterns of involvement across different leukodystrophies. Furthermore, this approach may facilitate the use of atrophy as a biomarker for assessing disease severity in clinical trials.