Exclusion of fire and grazing does not reduce annual grass invasion in a sagebrush steppe ecosystem

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Disturbance is widely recognized as a catalyst of invasion, but growing evidence suggests even protected communities are susceptible to severe infestation. We used kīpukas—naturally isolated patches of minimally-disturbed vegetation surrounded by lava flows—as a large-scale natural experiment to test the long-term biotic resistance of protected sagebrush ecosystems threatened by Bromus tectorum and other invasive annual grasses. Employing a robust causal inference approach combining matching with regression adjustment, we compared protected communities within kīpukas to otherwise similar communities exposed to contemporary disturbance regimes. Despite their near-total protection from fire and livestock grazing, kīpukas were extensively invaded by annual grasses (18.9 ± 0.28% cover), with abundance comparable to or slightly exceeding disturbed sites (16.7 ± 0.29% cover). These findings challenge the notion that protection from disturbance confers effective long-term resistance to invasion, instead demonstrating that invaders can establish, proliferate, and drive ecosystem transformation where favorable abiotic conditions prevail. Our findings reveal the limits of passive protection as a conservation strategy, suggesting active management may be necessary to prevent ecosystem degradation by aggressive invaders.

Article activity feed