PRV-101 Coxsackievirus B vaccine elicits protective T follicular helper immunity while avoiding cytotoxic T-cell responses in humans: implications for type 1 diabetes prevention

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

PRV-101 is a multivalent formalin-inactivated Coxsackievirus B (CVB) vaccine developed to prevent CVB infections, which are associated with increased risk of islet autoimmunity. While PRV-101 induces robust neutralizing antibody responses, its T-cell immunogenicity is unknown. We analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 25 healthy adults receiving three high or low PRV-101 doses or placebo in a Phase I randomized, placebo-controlled trial. CVB-reactive CD8⁺ T-cell responses were assessed using HLA Class I multimers, and CD4⁺ and T follicular helper (Tfh) responses were measured by activation-induced marker assays following stimulation with a CVB peptide library. PRV-101 elicited minimal CVB-reactive CD8⁺ T-cell responses but robust CD4⁺ and Tfh responses, peaking at week 12 and persisting through week 32. Responses were observed in both seronegative and seropositive individuals, consistent with effective immune priming and boosting. Tfh frequencies correlated with neutralizing antibody titers. Female participants exhibited higher peak Tfh responses than males. We conclude that PRV-101 elicits a CVB-protective immune profile, dominated by Tfh responses supporting durable humoral immunity and devoid of potentially diabetogenic cytotoxic T-cell responses. This profile invites further investigations in vaccine trials for type 1 diabetes prevention.

Article Highlights

PRV-101 induces robust neutralizing antibody responses, but its cellular immunogenicity remains undefined. Given the role of CD4⁺ T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in sustaining humoral immunity, we asked whether PRV-101 induces protective T-cell responses. We found that PRV-101 elicited minimal CD8⁺ T-cell responses but robust Tfh responses in both CVB-seronegative and seropositive individuals, which correlated with neutralizing antibody titers. These findings indicate a coordinated humoral and Tfh response deviated away from potentially diabetogenic cytotoxic CD8⁺ T-cell activation, supporting further evaluation of PRV-101 for type 1 diabetes prevention.

Article activity feed