Top 50 Cited Articles on Pediatric Respiratory Infections: A Web of Science Bibliometric Analysis

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Pediatric respiratory infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, representing a major health challenge in children.

Research Gap

Despite extensive studies on epidemiology, clinical management, and specific pathogens, no bibliometric analysis has systematically evaluated the most influential research in this field.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of the top 50 most-cited articles on pediatric respiratory infections and to identify emerging research trends.

Methods

The Web of Science database was searched without publication year restrictions. Independent reviewers screened studies based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted using a standardized form, including study details.

Results

The 50 most-cited articles ranged from 34 to 384 citations and showed a right-skewed distribution with a sharp drop after the top ten. Publication years ranged from 1978 to 2021, with over half published in the 2010s. Articles appeared in 31 journals, with Pediatrics contributing five. Leading countries were the United States (18%), China (12%), and Canada (10%), with research largely concentrated in high-income regions and limited multicenter collaboration. Cohort studies dominated (66%), while randomized trials (12%) and reviews/meta-analyses (16%) were less common. Research clustered around three themes: clinical outcomes (e.g., pneumonia, bronchiolitis); viral etiology/diagnostics (e.g., RSV, SARS-CoV-2); and antimicrobial stewardship.

Conclusion

Over the past decades, pediatric respiratory infection research has developed but remains unbalanced, relying heavily on observational evidence from high-income countries, with limited randomized trials, systematic reviews, multicenter collaborations, and LMIC-led studies. These findings provide insights that may direct researchers to identify potential focal points and guide future research in the field.

Article activity feed