Omics analysis of MRSA under antibiotic stress identifies conserved adaptive modules and candidate adjuvant targets

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) survives antibiotic exposure through coordinated physiological adaptation that extends beyond canonical resistance determinants. Here, we used an untargeted multi-omics strategy integrating proteomics, post-translational modifications, and metabolomics to characterize MRSA ATCC 43300 responses to five mechanistically distinct antibiotics: ampicillin, methicillin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin. Cells were exposed to 0.5×, 1×, and 2× IC 50 , enabling comparison of graded stress responses across antibiotic classes.

Across treatments, MRSA did not deploy fully distinct drug-specific programs. Instead, antibiotic exposure repeatedly converged on a limited set of conserved adaptive modules detectable across independent molecular layers. These included coupling of envelope stress with genome maintenance, recurrent remodeling of metal/cofactor and redox homeostasis, sustained pressure on nucleotide and folate metabolism, and reprogramming of transport and surface-associated functions. A particularly robust cross-antibiotic signature was the accumulation of MoO 2 -molybdopterin cofactor. Ciprofloxacin additionally induced compensatory envelope reinforcement, supporting tight coupling between DNA damage responses and cell-envelope maintenance.

Overall, the data support a unified model in which MRSA buffers mechanistically distinct antibiotic stress through a compact set of conserved stress-response functions rather than through entirely separate adaptive programs. These recurrent modules highlight candidate adjuvant vulnerabilities, particularly in metal/cofactor handling, nucleotide supply and repair, and transport/envelope compensation pathways. As this was an exploratory design intended to identify candidate adaptive patterns, these vulnerabilities now require validation in biologically replicated cultures and targeted functional studies.

Article activity feed