Reproducible Human Reward Imaging Phenotypes Exhibit Differential Sensitivity to Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonism

Human reward processing varies along cue-centric and outcome-centric axes, but a reproducible mechanistic account of individual variation in incentive salience attribution has been lacking. Using fMRI across five cohorts (N-total=1,252; N1=890; N2=245; N3=34; N4=48; N5=34), we identified two robust imaging phenotypes mirroring sign- and goal-tracking (ST-like, GT-like). ST-like individuals showed dominant ventral striatal responses to reward-anticipation cues and sustained incentive salience attribution; GT-like individuals showed heightened responses to reward outcomes. This distinction was replicable across sites and independent samples. Single-dose and repeated-dose D ₂ /D ₃ antagonism (risperidone, haloperidol, amisulpride) selectively reduced anticipatory ventral striatal activity in ST, with single-dose antagonism additionally producing a parallel drop in self-reported energy. Instead, D ₂ /D ₃ partial agonism (aripiprazole) increased anticipatory and reduced outcome-phase responses in GT. In a psychosis cohort, antipsychotic D ₂ affinity was associated with blunted anticipatory signals and higher negative symptom burden, offering a neuroimaging-driven basis for stratifying patients and predicting response to dopaminergic agents.