Characterising and Minimising Step and Filtering Artifacts in TMS-EEG Recordings

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) enables direct measurement of cortical reactivity via TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). Interpretation of early TEP components however, is highly sensitive to stimulation and hardware-related artifacts. We identified and characterised a persistent, non-neural ‘step-drift’ artifact unexpectedly present in recent TMS-EEG recordings from our group. We show that the artifact is distinct from previously described TMS pulse and discharge/decay artifacts and likely reflects a hardware interaction phenomenon. We demonstrated that amplifier settings, but not TMS pulse shape, substantially influenced artifact expression, with DC-coupled recordings with no online high-pass filter reducing step amplitude compared with AC-coupled recordings with a high-pass filter. Simulations additionally revealed that filtering over the step-drift artifact introduced pronounced ringing and edge artifacts, highlighting the need to address this artifact prior to data processing. We propose a processing pipeline incorporating robust polynomial detrending and a modified Butterworth filter with autoregressive extrapolation that minimised TEP distortion in both simulated and real data containing the step-drift artifact. Together, these findings provide practical recommendations for both preventing and correcting step-drift artifacts and underscore the need for formal definition and routine recognition of this artifact to improve reproducibility and data quality in TMS-EEG research.

Article activity feed