Risk Stratification of Arrhythmogenic Consequences of Andersen-Tawil Syndrome Affecting Kir2.1-PIP2 Interactions

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background

Andersen-Tawil syndrome type 1 (ATS1) is caused by loss-of-function mutations in KCNJ2 , which encodes the inward rectifier K + channel Kir2.1, a key determinant of I K1 . Impaired Kir2.1 destabilizes membrane excitability and predisposes to ventricular arrhythmias. Most ATS1 variants disrupt channel regulation by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), but whether specific mutations confer differential arrhythmic risk remains unclear.

Objective

To determine whether ATS1 variants disrupting Kir2.1–PIP2 interactions define distinct arrhythmic risk profiles and establish a mechanistically informed framework for risk stratification.

Methods

We performed a pooled patient-level analysis of 225 ATS1 patients carrying KCNJ2 variants impairing Kir2.1-PIP2 interaction. Inclusion of 22 clinical and electrocardiographic variables were used to identify mutation-specific risk profiles and predictors for arrhythmia risk. The approach was validated in a multicenter cohort of 20 ATS1 patients. Functional validation was performed using patient-derived iPSC-CMs, cardiac-targeted mouse models, and structural in silico analyses.

Results

ATS1 variants segregated into three discrete clusters corresponding to high-, intermediate-, and low-risk arrhythmic phenotypes, establishing a mutation-dependent hierarchy of arrhythmic risk. Regression analyses identified six variables independently associated with severe arrhythmic outcomes. In patient-derived Patient-derived iPSC-CM demonstrated graded impairment of electrical propagation and arrhythmia susceptibility, with a hierarchy in CV (Control > R82W > R218W > G215D). ATS1 mouse models reproduced the clinical risk stratification. Structural modeling showed that high-risk variants localize near the channel pore and disrupt Kir2.1–PIP2 interactions through mutation-specific mechanisms.

Conclusions

ATS1 caused by Kir2.1–PIP2–disrupting variants is not a uniform disorder but comprises biologically distinct subgroups with predictable differences in arrhythmic severity. Integrating genetics, functional phenotyping, and structural modeling provides a mechanistically grounded framework for ATS1 risk stratification and precision therapy development.

Article activity feed