Neuroimaging and behavioural biomarkers of post-stroke cognitive recovery outcomes

Lesion anatomy has been widely used to study post stroke cognitive outcomes, but it is unclear whether lesion-based measures provide clinically meaningful prognostic information beyond established predictors. Stroke survivors (n = 408) completed the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) during acute hospitalisation and at chronic (6-month) follow-up. Lesion characteristics and structural disconnection profiles associated with chronic OCS scores were identified using ROI-level, voxel-level and structural network disconnection lesion mapping approaches. The incremental predictive value of these measures, relative to acute behaviour and pre-morbid brain health, was evaluated using regression analyses, receiver operating curve (ROC) and support vector regression (SVR) models predicting continuous chronic scores.

Significant lesion and disconnection correlates of chronic cognitive impairment were identified for 9/10 OCS subtests. The extent of damage to these correlates was significantly associated with chronic cognitive scores, but their diagnostic utility for identifying persistent impairment was low under conventional thresholds (AUC mean = 0.59, range= 0.46–0.66). Acute cognitive task performance was the single best predictor of chronic cognition (AUC mean = 0.66, range = 0.41–0.95). In multivariate analyses, SVR models trained on acute cognitive performance and regional atrophy severity scores both outperformed models trained on lesion anatomy or structural disconnection across most cognitive domains. SVR models combining anatomical, disconnection and behavioural predictors did not improve predictions accuracy relative to behaviour- or atrophy-only models.

Together, these findings demonstrate that statistically significant lesion–outcome relationships do not necessarily translate into clinically useful prognostic indicators. In a large, clinically representative stroke cohort, detailed lesion-based measures provided limited incremental prognostic value beyond acute cognitive assessment and coarse brain health markers. These results highlight the importance of explicitly evaluating predictive utility when developing prognostic models for post-stroke cognitive outcomes.