Structural bias in machine learning-guided peptide design

Machine learning continues to accelerate peptide and protein design through the rapid prediction and generation of sequences with desired characteristics. Many applications focus on predicting properties, functions, and structures, as well as generating point mutations and de novo designs. Nevertheless, many models prove less generalizable than initially claimed. Most predictors and generators are trained on sequential datasets, where imbalances can be addressed during preprocessing. In contrast, structural bias, a subtype of algorithmic bias arising from uneven representation of structural classes in training datasets, and the limitations of early protein structure predictors have frequently remained undetected and uncorrected. The recent surge in powerful protein structure prediction tools, such as the AlphaFold and RosettaFold series and their variants, now presents opportunities to mitigate this issue. We hypothesize that such structural sampling biases influence the downstream performance of ML models. Using antimicrobial peptides as a case study, we audited the structural biases in 16 state-of-the-art predictors for antimicrobial activity and tested whether structural information constrains their predictions. Our analysis revealed that models explicitly trained on sequential data still produce predictions biased by uneven fold representations and data leakage. These findings highlight the importance of integrating balanced structural data or implementing bias-mitigating strategies to develop agnostic models that maximize bioactive protein discovery and multi-objective optimization.