With great power comes great responsibility: how scientific supervisors shape the wellbeing of early-career researchers

Scientific supervision is central to the experience of early-career researchers (ECRs), yet its role in shaping wellbeing and retention remains underexamined from the ECR perspective. We analyzed 2,604 anonymous survey responses from predoctoral, postdoctoral and former researchers across 65 countries. Overall, 76% of respondents reported that their supervisor’s attitude had a moderate or severe impact on mental health. Although most entered academia for vocational reasons, negative experiences with supervisors were among the most frequently reported reasons for leaving among former researchers (48%), comparable to job insecurity and financial instability. Harm was most often associated with poor communication, disregard for wellbeing, micromanagement and competitiveness. In contrast, ECRs valued supportive rather than boss-like supervision, regular communication, realistic expectations and respect for personal time. These findings identify supervisory behavior as a major and modifiable determinant or ECRs wellbeing and retention, and highlight the need for stronger institutional accountability, mentor training and funding incentives that recognize mentorship as a core component of research culture.