Referential and attentional accounts of dog point-following in an asymmetric multi-cup design

Human pointing is often used to test whether dogs extract object-specific information from human communicative cues. However, above-chance responses in standard object-choice tasks do not by themselves distinguish between a referential interpretation, in which the gesture identifies a specific target, and an attentional interpretation, in which it primarily biases behaviour toward a broader spatial region. We addressed this issue using an asymmetric six-cup arrangement designed to separate coarse side guidance from exact cup localisation more clearly than a symmetric multi-cup design. Performance in domestic dogs was analysed using three measures: the probability of reaching the correct side, the probability of choosing the correct cup overall, and the probability of choosing the correct cup conditional on having first reached the correct side. The principal comparison involved three matched trial classes: the symmetric 3-vs-3 condition, 2-vs-4 trials with the baited cup on the 2-cup side, and 2-vs-4 trials with the baited cup on the 4-cup side. Descriptively, pointing trials exceeded matched no-point control trials more clearly for side selection than for overall cup choice. The clearest condition effect was observed at the level of side guidance. Dogs were most likely to reach the correct side when the baited cup was located on the 4-cup side of the unequal arrangement. Mixed-effects models confirmed a reliable group effect for side accuracy, whereas overall cup accuracy showed only a weaker and less robust condition effect, and within-side localisation revealed no reliable group difference once condition-specific chance baselines were taken into account. A complementary generative model comparison converged on the same conclusion: a referential-only model fit poorly, an attention-only model captured most of the grouped outcome structure, and a combined model yielded only a modest improvement. Dog point-following is therefore best understood as a layered process dominated by attentional guidance, with only limited additional target-specific localisation.