Assessing the Efficacy of Computational Workshops and Participatory Live Coding in Evolutionary Biology

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Computational workshops are common in evolutionary biology and are used to share discipline-specific tools and skills with researchers. Despite the perceived importance of these workshops, there is no common set of criteria for workshop success, and there are few peer-reviewed studies investigating the efficacy of workshops or assessing the value of particular instructional techniques in this context. Here, we focused on one key element of a successful workshop: its ability to increase participants’ motivation to use the methods and tools presented during the workshop. We analyzed the goals, perceptions, and future plans of research practitioners engaging in a workshop on phylogenetic methods of historical biogeography using pre- and post-workshop surveys. Overall, the workshop was successful at motivating participants, and survey responses provided insights into participants’ perceptions of different activities, including “participatory live coding”. Apart from this case study, we aim to highlight the importance of developing a common set of workshop goals in collaboration with other workshop stakeholders and the need for specialized, validated tools for assessing the efficacy of computational workshops for researchers.

Article activity feed