Contrast-induced changes in chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI differentiate tumor progression from pseudoprogression
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Tumor pseudo-progression (PsP) refers to an initial increase in tumor size or the appearance of new lesions. These pseudo-progressive lesions are predominantly composed of infiltrative inflammatory cells, such as macrophages. This phenomenon commonly occurs in patients undergoing radiation therapy or immunotherapy and typically indicates a positive treatment response. However, it often leads to premature treatment cessation due to misinterpretation as disease progression. Non-invasive imaging biomarkers capable of distinguishing pseudo-progression from true progression would greatly aid in treatment decision-making. In our preliminary study, we explored the potential of gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA, a macrocyclic Gd-contrast) in combination with amine chemical-exchange saturation transfer (amine-CEST) imaging to differentiate tumor from radiation necrosis by assessing Gd-DOTA uptake by infiltrating immune cells, such as macrophages. To evaluate whether amine-CEST, in combination with Gd-DOTA, can differentiate macrophages from cancer cells, we incubated them with Gd-DOTA for 30 minutes. Subsequently, the cells were processed, and amine-CEST imaging was performed on a 9.4 Tesla preclinical scanner. Upon treatment with Gd-DOTA, we did not observe a significant change in amine-CEST contrast in F98 cells compared with untreated cells, whereas treated macrophages exhibited a marked decrease (∼40%) in amine-CEST signal compared with untreated macrophages. This reduction in signal was attributed to the uptake of Gd-DOTA by macrophages, which notably shortened water T 1 relaxation, thereby quenching the amine-CEST signal. Conversely, cancer cells showed no appreciable change in the amine-CEST signal, indicating no Gd-DOTA uptake. Furthermore, to validate that T 1 shortening influences amine-CEST signal, cancer cells were also treated with manganese chloride (MnCl 2 ) for 30 minutes. The uptake of MnCl 2 by cancer cells similarly induced T 1 shortening, as observed in macrophages, resulting in a decrease in the amine-CEST signal from these cells. Next, we performed the amin-CEST imaging on F98 tumor-bearing rats and radiation necrotic rats. Post-injection with Gd-DOTA showed no appreciable change in the amine-CEST contrast in the tumor-bearing rat, whereas a significant decrease in contrast was observed in the radiation necrotic rat. This further demonstrates that no change in the amine-CEST contrast in tumor-bearing rats is due to cancer cells failing to take up Gd-DOTA. The decrease in amine-CEST contrast in radiation-treated rats reflects the uptake of Gd-DOTA by macrophages infiltrating the radiation-necrotic regions. This straightforward imaging approach holds promise for clinical translation. It offers a novel method for characterizing pseudo-progressive lesions and monitoring diverse treatment responses in cancer patients using standard clinical scanners.