Thinking outside of the box: Refining rat housing to improve welfare

Standard rat housing may impede species-typical behaviors and impact rat welfare and research outcomes. This research investigated the effects of housing on behavioral and physiological outcomes of rats through the use of modified large animal cages for housing, and was conducted in two studies. Study A: 70 Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (34 males, 36 females; 5 wk old) were randomly assigned to standard polycarbonate shoebox cages (C: 733.9cm ² ) or modified stainless steel primate cages (T: 10,416cm ² ) for 18 days. In Study B: 48 SD rats (24 males, 24 females; 7.5 wk old) were held in T housing for 90 days to assess long term impacts. All rats received gentle handling for 15s 3x/week. Rats were assessed for body weight, anxiety-like behavior in an elevated plus maze, response during a voluntary human approach test, and overall home cage behavior, posture, and space usage. Data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models, with sex and treatment as fixed effects, and cage as the random effect. The results of study A suggest that the modified large animal cages (T) had positive impacts on rat behavior and welfare. T rats were less anxious ( P =0.038) and more active ( P <0.0001) and explorative (P=0.0003) compared to C rats. In both groups, activity levels declined towards the end of the 18-day study period ( P <0.0001). For study B, similar patterns were observed, with rats becoming more inactive ( P <0.0001) over 90 days. However, rats spent significant time on elevated shelves in T housing, which increased throughout the study (P<0.0001), suggesting continued use of the resources the housing provided. In both studies, there were no differences in latency to approach humans (P>0.05), but T rats spent less time in contact with human handlers, suggesting differences in motivation to interact with humans that should be explored further.