Interspecies synergism and antagonism induce differential and potentially exploitable susceptibility to various classes of antibiotics in a wound-like polymicrobial community

Chronic wounds are persistent and difficult to treat. Often this is because they are colonized by polymicrobial communities which contribute to changes in antimicrobial susceptibilities, making these infections harder to effectively clear. We explored the role a community can play in individual members’ survival when challenged by antibiotics, specifically looking at a community consisting of Staphylococcus aureus , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Enterococcus faecalis , and Acinetobacter baumannii . Our data shows that communities can contribute to both increases and decreases in susceptibilities depending on the species and the antibiotic. The changes in susceptibilities can be due to interspecies cooperation or competition, with identifiable mechanisms. We also demonstrated that current antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods used in hospitals, which focus on determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) via determination of visible turbidity breakpoints, are not able to truly indicate the clearance of bacteria, as species can persist in higher antibiotic concentrations after visible turbidity is gone. To combat decreases in antibiotic susceptibilities contributed to by the community, we used our data from individual antibiotics to determine a potentially effective antibiotic combination, similar to combinatorial therapy used in hospitals to treat recalcitrant infections. Our data proved useful, as the combination of gentamicin and cephalexin was able to overcome polymicrobial synergism and clear the desired bacteria. This demonstrates that it is possible to determine effective antibiotic treatments for polymicrobial infections, whether they be combinatorial in nature or not. One simply must account for the role of the community in order to prescribe the most effective treatment.