Prebiotic Selection as a Physical Process: An Information Quasi-Potential Framework for Chemical Convergence

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The emergence of amino acids (AAs) and nucleobases (NBs) across meteorites, interstellar ices, and laboratory shock experiments presents a paradox: why do these specific molecular motifs—a minuscule subset of organic chemistry’s combinatorial space—appear repeatedly across diverse environments, in the absence of biological selection? We identify a physical mechanism, prebiotic selection , which biases driven chemical systems toward configurations with high stationary probability p *( x ) under sustained entropy flux. The bias is quantified by an information quasi-potential Φ I ( x ) = − ln p *( x ), entering the overdamped Langevin dynamics where Σ is the local entropy production rate (Schnakenberg 1976). Φ I is defined self-consistently via the full non-equilibrium stationary density, avoiding the circularity of identifying it with a scalar potential. Two central theorems underlie the framework. Theorem 1 establishes that ∇Σ and ∇Φ I are generically linearly independent off equilibrium, so the dynamics is genuinely two-field. Theorem 2 (structural constraints on single-field gradient dynamics) shows that single-field models on compact manifolds (i) produce yield curves that are at most unimodal under linear driving, and (ii) combine disjoint perturbations additively, giving superlinearity factor S = 1 + O (∥ δV2 ). The observed superlinear synergy of Ferris et al. (1996) lies far outside this perturbative bound and therefore requires the two-field structure of EOM-IFF; the non-monotonic peak of Blank et al. (2001) is consistent with two-field dynamics and also with single-field dynamics in the unimodal-with-peak case of Theorem 2 part 1, so it does not by itself discriminate. From these results, we: (i) define a formal substrate-minimal criterion for prebiotic selection; (ii) show consistency with the non-monotonic shock-synthesis yield of Blank et al. (2001) ( R 2 = 0.885, peak at P * = 28.4 ± 1.4 GPa); (iii) show consistency with the superlinear clay-catalysed RNA polymerisation of Ferris et al. (1996) (synergy factor S ≈ 5.75, robust under ±1-nucleotide measurement uncertainty); and (iv) state two further falsifiable predictions awaiting dedicated experimental tests. Every lemma and theorem is accompanied by explicit assumptions, regime of validity, and regime of failure; the framework’s scope is what it claims, not more. Prebiotic selection is identified as a physical process distinct from and prior to biological selection, offering a unified account of chemical convergence in carbon-nitrogen chemistry under sustained entropy flux.

Article activity feed