Sign and strength of pairwise interactions in natural isolates depend on environment type

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Bacterial interactions-whether positive or negative – are crucial for the functioning of microbial communities. Though bacterial interactions are mainly expected to be negative, the sign and strength of interactions are predicted to be context dependent, with interactions typically being more positive in more stressful and nutrient-poor conditions. However, systematic studies investigating how the environment affects interactions between multiple taxa are lacking.

Here, we determine if interactions between a panel of natural soil isolates change in response to the environment in which they are grown, with two different artificial media used (one simple and one complex) and a more ecologically relevant soil wash. To maximise natural variation in interactions, we collected multiple isolates from multiple sites: co-occurring (sympatric) isolates were predicted to show more negative interactions than allopatric isolates because of greater overlap in resource use. Pairwise interactions were in general negative, but more negative when grown in a complex lab-derived medium (Tryptic Soy Broth). Mutually beneficial interactions were most common in a simple resource medium (M9 minimal media) and exploitative interactions were most frequent in a soil broth. These patterns were independent of whether species originated from the same or a different site. The study supports the prediction that nutrient rich environments promote more negative interactions, and that measuring interactions of soil isolates in standard lab media is likely to misrepresent interactions occurring in natural environments.

Article activity feed