Assessing Brain-Behaviour Coupling in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Using Reliable Change Indices: Evidence from pre-Supplementary Motor Area – right Inferior Frontal Gyrus transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NiBS) studies frequently report exploratory correlations between individual-level changes in neurophysiological and behavioural measures. However, these analyses are typically underpowered and rely on ratio-based change scores with known statistical limitations. We addressed these limitations by pooling individual data from three independent studies (total N = 69), providing adequate power to detect small-to-medium effects. All studies applied 20 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) targeting the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), regions central to inhibitory control. Changes in preSMA–rIFG connectivity measured with EEG imaginary coherence (ImCoh) and response inhibition (stop-signal reaction time, SSRT) were quantified using reliable change indices (RCI), which were z-standardised within studies to enable pooled mixed-effects regression. No meaningful association was found between tACS-induced ImCoh change and SSRT change (r = .013, marginal R² = .004), with project-wise correlations that were small, non-significant, and inconsistent in direction. Sensitivity analysis using ratio-based change scores converged on the same null result (r = .014), though ratio scores showed severe distributional violations relative to the approximately normal RCI distributions, supporting the methodological case for RCI on statistical grounds.

These results provide no support for a systematic individual-level brain–behaviour coupling between preSMA–rIFG connectivity and response inhibition following 20 Hz tACS, and suggest that any true effect is likely to be small. The present work offers a methodological benchmark for quantifying individual-level brain–behaviour coupling in NiBS research, and highlights the need for more sensitive neural markers and adequately powered design.

Article activity feed