A robust phenomenological approach to investigate COVID-19 data for France
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
We provide a new method to analyze the COVID-19 cumulative reported cases data based on a two-step process: first we regularize the data by using a phenomenological model which takes into account the endemic or epidemic nature of the time period, then we use a mathematical model which reproduces the epidemic exactly. This allows us to derive new information on the epidemic parameters and to compute the effective basic reproductive ratio on a daily basis. Our method has the advantage of identifying robust trends in the number of new infectious cases and produces an extremely smooth reconstruction of the epidemic. The number of parameters required by the method is parsimonious: for the French epidemic between February 2020 and January 2021 we use only 11 parameters in total.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.10.21251500: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank…
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.10.21251500: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
-
